THE LAST GOOD WAR: A Novel
I think I'll add a star to my review from last time. Oct 15, Anthony rated it it was amazing Shelves: I read this book in the Kindle format and discovered that I could actually expand the charts laying out the battle positions, something that was heretofore frustrating to me. This was a book well written and documented. It is about the struggles of the US involvement in the "Great War". It was gritty and captivating with well developed characters and a very strict adherence to historical facts.
Jeff Shaara is an author of our times but he has a head and a heart for history. I have to say, I was able to feel the thrill of both battle and flight. I could easily smell and feel the pain of the characters. If I was to do a study or a class on World War I, this book would be required reading. I love history and have read numerous books by this author and have never been disappointed irrespective of the time period he wrote about.
I loved the fact that he highlighted after the book, what happened historically too the characters in this book after the Great War. Some results were surprising and disappointing.
Jun 13, Jerry Kolwinska rated it it was amazing. I always enjoy Shaara's work. This was especially fulfilling as it tags nicely onto the PBS special on WW1 that was shown earlier this year. The characters that Shaara follows in this novel are well developed and authentic. The Lafayette escadrille was fascinating as I had not read much about the squadron and its cast of characters. The German characters were interesting as well.
The trench war was gruesome, and Shaara's attempt to capture that element of the war is quite successful in my estima I always enjoy Shaara's work. The trench war was gruesome, and Shaara's attempt to capture that element of the war is quite successful in my estimation. I liked his development of the armistice. He focused on several things that I was not familiar with regarding the ending of the war. If you like historic fiction, you will like this book. It reads well, and while not a spellbinder, I was engaged through every chapter and episode.
I would have finished it earlier, but spending time with family, and several major work projects cut into my reading time. To avoid spoilers, I will only say that the title of the book is well chosen. Jul 09, travelgirlut rated it liked it Shelves: I don't know too much about WWI, so this was a pretty decent introduction. However, be aware that this mainly deals with Americans in the war, so you miss a lot of what went on in the first 4 years before the U. There were a few things I didn't like about this book. I found the author's way of writing in short choppy connected phrases to be extremely distracting.
All of the main characters had the same kind of idealistic inner voice. It was all a bit overly emoti I don't know too much about WWI, so this was a pretty decent introduction. It was all a bit overly emotional to me, though that's not quite the right word. The main characters do a lot of deep, probing introspection that I'm not sure real people actually do. If you've read a lot about WWI then this book may not appeal to you, but if you're just starting out, you wouldn't be too off the mark starting here. Jan 10, Dan M. It is a story of four fighters and their experiences in World War I.
As the book progresses, the characters become more relatable because of the adventures that they go on and bravery that they demonstrate. Shaara uses exquisite imagery to make the reader feel like they are soaring through the air and trekking through the mud. He creates four primary characters named Lufbery, Richthofen, Ludendorff, and Perishing to show the war from three different perspectives. Lufbery and Richthofen tell the story from the air, Lufbery is a high government official in the mist of government decision making, and Perishing a soldier marching through the country side.
Having these different perspectives and accurate historical content makes the reader understand what it was like in different parts of the war while still gaining information about World War I. To The Last Man was an interesting book because of the surprising facts that were included from history. I learned that World War I was the first war that aerial attacks and fighting was used. I found this interesting because now almost every country has an air force upon which they rely on in times of war.
Also, World War I was the first time that gas was used to kill enemy forces. One example of when this gas was used was when Perishing was in the trench and mustard gas was thrown into the trench. There was rationing in this war a lack of food. An example of this is when Shaara has the French troops go for two to three days at a time without food. This was interesting because today in the modern world there would never be troops suffering from food shortages.
The most intriguing fact that was included in this book was the lack of government intelligence at the time. Recently we the U. The lack of sophisticated World War I intelligence allows for Shaara to make false surrender to come into to play. Is it enough to tip the scales of the war? Although I enjoyed reading this book I disliked the length of which the book was pages. Besides this and the slow start I appreciated the novel, from the imagery to the relatable characters, the book was great. I would defiantly recommend this book to a strong reader who wants a book that will keep them interested and will provide a substantial amount of factual information from the area.
I liked this book a great deal. As with all of Mr. Shaara's books, it is a novel because he puts thoughts and feelings into the real people in his book. Other than that, it's pretty much history.
Lessons From Fahrenheit 451 for the Modern Day
I've read several novels about WWI and for awhile concluded that I didn't want to read anymore, mostly because of the constant references I liked this book a great deal. I've read several novels about WWI and for awhile concluded that I didn't want to read anymore, mostly because of the constant references to the horrors of trench warfare: There is certainly some of that in this book how could there not be? But it also goes above the trenches into the aerial battles between the pilots as well as the difficulties General Pershing faces with trying to keep U. I really liked the narration of the book in the audio version.
I ended up checking out the Kindle version, too so I could see the maps. Sep 11, Julia rated it liked it. The aviators, Lufbery and Richthofen, one American fighting with the French; Richthofen, a German ace -- give in depth accounts of the details and daily life in the newly built air corps. Pershing's perspective talks about dealing with the British commanders, the French politicians, American politicians who only hear of the war's happenings through the skewe World War I seen through the eyes of Raoul Lufbery, Manfred von Richthofen, Charles Pershing, Henri Petain and Roscoe Temple, among others.
Pershing's perspective talks about dealing with the British commanders, the French politicians, American politicians who only hear of the war's happenings through the skewed media, and his own military's politics and formation. This was the first large scale army taken into war by a commanding general in charge of the whole group. Very interesting what Pershing's history and experience lead him to do.
I found many parts of it fascinating but it's exceedingly long on details and drags horribly in certain places. I love a good war novel but this one took forever to get through. I'm not scared of thick books but I got really tired of this after a while. Aug 30, Bob rated it liked it Shelves: A good book, but not what I was expecting, although I admit I don't know exactly what I was expecting.
Share this article
It's focused pretty much solely on the American perspective of the World War I, so you've got kind of a limited viewpoint there. Except that he randomly threw in the Red Baron as one of his perspective characters, which is a totally different look, and feels jarring. Also, 2 of his 4 main viewpoint characters are pilots, wh A good book, but not what I was expecting, although I admit I don't know exactly what I was expecting. Also, 2 of his 4 main viewpoint characters are pilots, which gives a strangely aviation-centric view of the war.
The background to the war is given in long narratives in the middle of the perspective character stories, and seem out-of-place when you come to them. Okay, so those were the downsides.
However, I'm still giving it 3 stars because it was still interesting to read and informative, and I liked reading it. It was an entertaining book, if you like military history. An eye-opening historical fiction of the amount of several soldiers from both sides of the war.
Nov 26, Chris rated it it was amazing. Best World War I book I've read in a good long time Dec 20, Riley Feldmann rated it liked it. This, I must admit, was my first experience listening reading? I never fully considered just how different a novel can come off in the form of an audiobook over the original written copy.mail.expanditnow.com/dramatic-reader-for-lower-grades.php
Best War Novels ( books)
Things like the quality o This, I must admit, was my first experience listening reading? Things like the quality of the narrator, the pacing of events, and the balance between dialog and setting of scenes all take on a level of importance that can be papered over when you're just reading a book. If I had actually paged through a physical copy of the book, I may have liked it much more. As it is, the fictional telling of the battlefields of the Western Front in WWI proved as mundane as many of the trench-filled landscapes it was placed in.
Shaara has a knack for featuring perspectives of figures both high and low. The cast of characters is extensive, and sometimes hard to keep track of, but we points of view ranging from Gen. John "Blackjack" Pershing down to a lowly American private stuck conducting the fight under horrific conditions.
This gives Shaara space to flesh out the story, bringing in the politicking between Allied generals, showing readers the thought process that led to fateful strategic decisions, and then bringing the consequences of leadership's choices to life through the eyes of the soldiers who prosecuted the war. On top of this, as the book proceeds, we see a changing of the main figures of the story: You open with Frenchmen at the vanguard of aerial warfare, only to have them replaced by army grunts slugging it out for every bare meter of ground.
This helps keeps things fresh, even if most chapters with each character are largely indistinguishable from the last. Praise must also be directed the narrator's way. I failed to catch his name, but he did a fine enough job giving variance of voice and personality to each line of dialogue brought his way. True, some of his accents could be over the top and sometimes comical every Frenchman and German sounds exactly the same as the last , but given the task at hand, he handled it admirably.
His base retelling of the details beyond the lines spoken between characters could be a bit bland at times, but I do not fault him here; rather, he was tasked with constantly reminding readers that the battlefield was grim, muddy, and full of shellholes. Even the best of narrators would be hard-pressed to give more life to such an inherently lifeless setting.
Unfortunately, it is that lifeless setting that brings the score down for me. This is the difficulty many books grappling with the First World War come up against. How do you keep readers engaged when talking about battles that would move maybe a mile or two over the course of months? A trench in Ypres looked and functioned a lot like a trench full of Americans near Amiens, and those trenches worked and functioned a lot like trenches that were taken from Germans and repurposed for the Allied cause.
Oftentimes I would be on a run listening to a chapter and finding myself zoning out because there were long stretches where the story's details failed to grab my attention.
To the Last Man: A Novel of the First World War
Again, this may have been avoided if I had read the book, but the audiobook version does suffer in this regard. Another area where the book fell short was in its characterization of the historical figures involved. I am unsure of how accurate Shaara's depictions of interactions between American leadership and that of its allies, but I loathed any chapter that featured Gen. Pershing as the main protagonist; his personality as depicted in the book made him dislikable in my opinion, and his generally shallow character was often dismissed in the books by others excusing him for just not "getting politics".
None of the fascinating individuals involved in the final throes of the conflict really stand out in this telling, and this soured me on my experience. I'll give To the Last Man three stars, not really because I thoroughly enjoyed the book, but because I appreciated the effort and attempt to give WWI its proper due. There is so much to the conflict that could be brought to life, and I sincerely hope other authors make the attempt.
But, as its title and nature suggest, this was a World War involving much more than the futile bloodletting that went on in France and Belgium for years on end. Hopefully others take up the potential storytelling there for the making; if To the Last Man is successful in spurring publishers' interest in WWI, it'll have all been worthwhile. Nov 18, Carlos Henrique rated it it was ok. Deixe-me tirar isso do caminho: Isso significa de que franceses e ingleses eram perfeitos? Another very poor offering fro Jeff Shaara.
This is a poorly written novelized history of World War I. The author is sadly not up to the task of saying anything really important about this horrifying war. As in his World War II books, his ineptitude is most jarring when trying to get in the heads of the German characters--but he's not that much better with the Americans. I certainly hope that Black Jack Pershing was a more sophisticated and interesting character than the one portrayed here.
I'm Another very poor offering fro Jeff Shaara. Slaughterhouse 5 is one of the world's great anti-war books.
The greatest war novels ever written
Centring on the infamous fire-bombing of Dresden in the Second World War, Billy Pilgrim's odyssey through time reflects the journey of our own fractured lives as we search for meaning in what we are afraid to know. Captain Cleve Connell arrives in Korea with a single goal: Other pilots question his guts. Cleve comes to question himself.
And then in one icy instant 40, feet above the Yalu River, his luck changes forever. Presented as a chain of interconnected short stories, O'Brien intrinsically links the weight of things individual soldiers carried on their backs and in their hearts. In a thought-provoking metafiction that will make you laugh and cry he unmasks the masculine facade, debunks the ideal of heroism, and reveals the Vietnam soldiers for what they really were: By Khaled Hosseini Afghanistan, Twelve-year-old Amir is desperate to win the local kite-fighting tournament and his loyal friend Hassan promises to help him.
But neither of the boys can foresee what will happen to Hassan that afternoon, an event that is to shatter their lives. After the Russians invade and the family is forced to flee to America, Amir realises that one day he must return to Afghanistan under Taliban rule. Hosseini explores the nature of friendship, of forgiveness and of redemption, set against the turbulent background of his native Afghanistan.
The definitive anti-war book. Written by a veteran of the First World War, it recounts in horrific and spellbinding detail the real life experience of war. Jacques Austerlitz is a successful architect in the Sixties who managed to flee Czechoslovakia before the outbreak of war in As Austerlitz attempts to come to terms with the fate of his parents, the book deals in themes of loss, memory and hope. Emotions that war deals explicitly in. Again, Heller writes from a unique vantage point — he flew 60 missions during This results in a comical tour-de-force that upon publication in was quickly embraced by the burgeoning counterculture.
A bewitching and maddening text, it takes the Dresden bombings of as its starting point and in the subsequent pages and through the eyes of its time-travelling protagonist Billy Pilgrim, eloquently demonstrates the ridiculousness of war. Ernest Hemingway was one such writer - he reported upon the war for the North American Newspaper Alliance.
In a novel laced with pathos and comedy, protagonist Joe Bonham loses his arms, legs and, improbably, his face in World War I. Some of the finest war writing focuses not on the bloody battles that punctuate a life in the trenches, but the friendships that are formed in such heightened circumstances. The success of the book catapulted Mailer to a fame we embraced with gusto. Like Hemingway, Graham Greene observed war in this case the First Indochina War from the vantage point of a foreign journalist. A novel that many soldiers who fought in the second Vietnam War read with in some cases doomed recognition.
Restless is equally superb. It focuses on a Russian woman who is recruited to work for the British Secret Service during World War II and who falls for her boss, who ultimately betrays her. War is the backdrop, but the misery that unfolds can be traced back to the conflict of ideologies and fighting. Within that there are manifold stories to be told, primarily of course the titular protagonist, but the threat and reality of war is always close to the surface.