Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science
Attempts have been made to extract DNA but unsuccessfully sequenced. So we're still - and that's in part, for a variety of reasons, which we don't have time to go into all the details - but we're still in want of a good sample of tissue from which DNA could be extracted. Well, I was going to say even if we did have DNA it poses kind of an interesting question though because as I'm sure you're aware, humans and chimpanzees, for example, share remarkable similarity of DNA in their sequence.
If this animal is also great ape and closer to the life of humans it will take a very good bit of sequence, a good sample, to yield sufficient information to discriminate between human and non-human DNA. Well I'm in Dr. I'm a graduate student and have actually taken the time to read his latest book.
And I have a question for Dr.
- Navigation menu.
- Cartas de amor à esposa que não tive (Portuguese Edition)!
- Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science by D. Jeffrey Meldrum.
- Gaspar Ruiz (Condenado a muerte por desertor) (Spanish Edition).
- God said, Tell them I AM.
Of all the evidences that you produce, which do you think are the closest to being able to be published in a peer-reviewed journal? Well, I already have published one article that deals with the footprint evidence, placing it in a much broader anthropological context.
Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science
The Sasquatch foot seems to be distinguished in its retention of a flexibility of the midfoot ph , much more similar to a great ape foot in that regard. And that very interesting feature has some intriguing parallels to aspects of the very earliest prominent bipeds.
And in fact, provides for me a very interesting juxtaposition of sort of two independent, potentially independent evolutions of bipedalism from a similar starting point that have - that express very similar characteristics in parallel. Are you an outcast? Are you considered to be like a cold fusion researcher on some other, you know, some other part of the campus? It kind of depends on who you ask, I guess, but not nearly to the extent that that article unfortunately portrayed.
I have to say that the situation was grossly exaggerated. It did include - the article did include very supportive statements and clarification by the dean of arts and sciences. And I think that represents the administration's attitude and the attitude of many of my colleagues who expressed their support.
I mean, the expressions of support and encouragement have been really quite overwhelming since that article aired. But there are - there is with out doubt some resistance. I mean obviously this is not perceived by some as a legitimate scientific endeavor. It's perceived as some sort of fringe or pseudo science. And, you know, I'd have to take the position that I am in disagreement with that, that those individuals have not really considered the evidence, nor the manner in which I'm pursuing the question.
Well, obviously, the convention in zoology is for the establishment or the recognition of a new species to be based on a type specimen, and I've never suggested - you know, I don't use the word I believe in the existence of Bigfoot. To me, that connotes a conviction in the absence of proof or evidence, at least. I simply say that the evidence is there, there's no refuting that. What does the evidence tell us, where does it lead us, and is there something behind this persistence of this phenomenon in western North America? Why do you think that's so - you know, relatively so few sightings are around.
If it were to survive so many years, so many generations, there would have to be enough of that creature to reproduce, would there not? And this is kind of a misconception. And depending on what part of the country you live in, I guess, it might be more acute. You go to areas where, you know, small towns and cities where the habitat is appropriate, where we think these animals may, in fact, reside, and for many people it's just part of the landscape. I mean, I have received hundreds and hundreds of communications - e-mails and letters here in the past three days, as you can imagine, in the wake of that story - and a large fraction of them share with me their experiences.
And many of them are absolutely, you know, down to earth, simple encounters in the woods, a hiker, a hunter or a woodsman or a recreationist, and they see something that they cannot account for, or they come upon footprints that they can't compare to any other animal they've seen before.
I mean, since being shown the footprints back in '96, I've seen - found tracks in very remote areas on at least five different occasions. In the book, I explain a couple of other experiences, where I think that there was something pretty close that we couldn't pin a label on by any other means, something rummaging through backpacks, say, able to negotiate clasps and flaps without leaving marks of claws or teeth.
But no, I've not seen one myself yet. Thank you for taking my call. I had a daytime sighting where I actually spent some time with what was clearly a Bigfoot creature at dusk, and I was essentially in the woods camping and playing my harmonica, and I heard something walk up a hillside very quickly, station itself by a tree where I couldn't see. I felt uncomfortable, and when I stopped playing my harmonica, it started walking.
I saw in the daylight a nine to 12 foot high creature with extremely straight shoulders, tucked back posture, and it moved into a clearing and stopped and turned around and looked at me and moved very slowly and comfortably back into the woods. And after seeing that famous film of that creature that you were talking about earlier, I found the film to be a creature where it was slumped over with hunched shoulders and swinging like an ape, and that's not what I saw.
I saw a very tall, austere, extremely straight backed -. No, matches Jeff's description of, you know, matches the description of a very upright, almost human gaited type of creature. Well certainly, and there's going to be individual variation. I mean, if you go stand on a street corner and just watch people walking by, you're going to note a variety of different degrees of uprightness and posture and manner of walking.
So it doesn't surprise me that what you saw doesn't match exactly what was on the Patterson film, but we're still talking in general about a tall, upright, hair covered animal. And your report is very interesting, too, the role that the harmonica playing may have played in attracting its attention or curiosity.
One of the individuals that I work with in the field quite regularly had the sighting in southern Colorado, and it was, we believe in part because she was sitting out on a boulder next to her tent playing a recorder. And it seems that it may have been the music that drew in this one individual that popped up standing behind her tent a mere 15 from her in the daylight of the afternoon, a really stunning experience. It changed her life. Do we think that Sasquatch or Bigfoot is related to Yeti, because Yeti's been sighted in other parts of the world.
Well, the Yeti or the abominable snowman in the Himalayas, if it exists, there's actually less evidence for it than there is for Sasquatch by a large measure. One of the things - the description is quite different in its stature and some of its behavior.
There was an error trying to load your rating for this title.
And from my vantage point, the footprints that have been attributed, at least those that are the most credible, which are very few in number, the clearest ones appear to have a divergent big toe. So with the divergent big toe, as opposed to the Sasquatch tracks, which have a toe that's aligned with the remaining digits. I was on a fishing trip a few years back with a friend. We flew up - we were about miles south of Hudson Bay in Canada there, and it was a small village called God's River. It's only accessible by plane.
And I was talking to one of the Indian guides there, and he was telling me a story about going out into the woods collecting firewood on a snowmobile, and the machine broke down, and he started following his track back to the village. And about halfway back, another track entered onto the trail of his fresh snowmobile track, and it was just a footprint, and he was wearing Size 12 bunny boots, and the track was several inches longer than his boots. And I mean, that was the extent of his story, but the guy that I went up there with is kind of a regular in that area, and he said the Indians up there have numerous stories.
And so I'm not sure if it's, you know, if it's something that they're trying to impress visitors or what, but you know, that was his story.
The figure's bipedal posture creates doubts for many people, because it makes the figure seem "humanlike". Any primate adpated to full bipedalism will have a humanlike posture. Human body shape and posture is optimized for efficiency and balance, especially when running at high speeds. Body proportions like those of apes, chimps or other tree climbing primates, are not as energy efficient when walking or running upright. Bio mechanics experts say the Patterson figure shows the muscle proportions a large bipedal primate would need, especially if it lived in the sort of rugged terrain where the footage was obtained.
People who don't pay close attention to the subtleties of the figure and its movement may quickly conclude that it's a man in a costume. Others see just the opposite. They are familiar enough with the way humans move to see the difference in this figure right away. Earlier versions of the Patterson footage were murky compared to this digital-from-master.
They were always analog generations removed from the original. Being closer to the original footage makes a significant difference in the level of detail visible. The Paul Freeman footage and Memorial Day footage are the only versions ever released, both digital-from-master dubs. In the documentary, scientists from various disciplines put the most compelling sasquatch evidence to the test.
Collectively their conclusions are ground-breaking. There is now scientific proof for the existence of a giant primate species in North America -- a species fitting the descriptions of sasquatches. He always interviews well, and I was accordingly happy to find this book. I am sad to say it was a complete disappointment. It took a long time to get through it - checking it out multiple times - and in retrospect, I should have just quit and called it good.
Meldrum comes across as snappy and peevish in tone through most Dr. Meldrum comes across as snappy and peevish in tone through most of the work. He does exactly what I hope scientists would not do: This has undermined more than a few scientists through the years, and I strongly believe Meldrum is among them.
He repeatedly says that this or that cast must be legitimate, because no one could create a cast with the appropriate degree of realism. Mostly, though, his tone annoyed me. At first I thought it was just snark. One of five stars. Feb 18, Leslie rated it it was amazing. If you have any interest whatsoever in the Bigfoot phenomenon, this is the book for you. But, the footprint analysis is only one aspect of the exhaustively researched cryptozoological studies meticulously accumulated in the pages of this book.
The evidence of Bigfoot is substantial, wide and varied. Although no body has ever been produced, the circumstantial evidence is pretty overwhelming. I had no idea that such a plethora of this type of evidence even existed. Major scientists, including the extremely well respected Primatologist, Dr. Jane Goodall, weigh in on the topic. Other experts consulted and cited in the book include fingerprint analysts, anthropologists, palentologists, biologists, primatologists and all manner of other scientists and field researchers.
It convinced me, to a degree of relative certainty, that there is, indeed, a giant North American primate living in the Pacific Northwest of these United States. If you read it, I think it will make a believer out of you, too.
Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science - Wikipedia
Or at least it was for me. Even though everything is explained fully, I ended having to re-read carefully over quite a few statistical passages before the numbers geled and made sense to my non-analytical brain. It was a relatively short book pages , but it took me a long time to read because of the scientific and statistical depth present in many of the chapters.
All in all, though, a great read and one that I would recommend to anyone interested in Cryptozoology. Apr 14, Robert Kiehn rated it really liked it Shelves: Jeff Meldrum has written a fine book about Sasquatch, Bigfoot and the scientific case for their existence. His book covers first hand exp. A variety of experts have been consulted on these issues, some of whom are doctors and scientists. This book also has a section on Cryptozoology. This book has 16 chapters in it and is about pages long.
Skeptics and their claims are also dealt with in this book to a certain extent. The book is very interesting to read though it is written in a very scientific and technical manner that sometimes may be hard to read for an average person like me who only know basic science, biology and zoology.
- Debbie Macomber: A Biography.
- childrens Bedtime Stories part1 (5 Bedtime Stories).
- CHAIN OF WITNESSES - THE INQUISITOR;
- Dont Let Me Go.
- Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science.
On a side note a video of the same name is also available on here and youtube as well. When researching sasquatch, the bounty of information is unfortunately muddied. No wonder people are confused about the evidence, there have been hoaxes and a wide range of personality types drawn to the field.
'Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science'
In surveying who is reliable, intelligent, qualified and approaching the topic scientifically-one man rose out clearly, Dr. He appears in documentaries, conventions and for interviews, because he is the leading scientist currently working on sasquatch and he is very good a When researching sasquatch, the bounty of information is unfortunately muddied. He appears in documentaries, conventions and for interviews, because he is the leading scientist currently working on sasquatch and he is very good at explaining the evidence even for those of us who do not have a science background. This book is the first place I will send people who are curious about Sasquatch.
It is well written, has strong explanations and easily summarizes and enhances the previous documentary of the same name. I am getting really into this topic so I am very grateful this book exists. I decided to go see the evidence for myself. Without doing that, I was not fully understanding the descriptions even with photos and videos highlighting the details.
It took a physical demonstration for me to understand the metatarsal break and about the pressure ridge in the footprints. The way the bones of the foot can be accounted for in the prints and individuals identified. How the thumb makes any sense from the knuckle casts and feeling the clear thumbnail for myself. I completely trust Dr. Apr 06, Rainboe Sims-Jones rated it liked it Shelves: Sasquatch is a highly researched study presenting the possibility of an undiscovered North American ape.
Meldrum argues that as homo erectus may have survived to the same time as modern Homo sapiens, it is possible that undiscovered homo-species could similarly be alive today.
E Sasquatch is a highly researched study presenting the possibility of an undiscovered North American ape. Enlisting the help of unbiased scientific experts of various fields to evaluate evidence—including casts of knuckles, a buttocks, multitudinous footprints and the Skookum body cast imprint of extremely large left forearm, hip, thigh, heel with Achilles tendon associated with bipedal species —Meldrum shows that the possibility of sasquatch existing is not impossible.
Hair and scat samples as well as photo, video, and audio evidence are also evaluated in the research. Meldrum proports that despite the disregard of the scientific community at large, there is some unidentified species wandering the Pacific Northwest and makes the possibility plausible. This was a thorough, unbiased source that would be an excellent supplement to anthropological and archaeological studies as well as folklore studies. Oct 04, Lee rated it liked it. In my opinion, Dr. Meldrum falls short here.
To the casual reader, this book could certainly be viewed as 'too sciency' but to the more scientific audience, the scientific process has not been completed here. Meldrum is convinced that Sasquatch exists I agree with Dr. Meldrum that a lot of historical information suggests Sasquatch may exist, but I was hoping for an up-to-date view on the topic. You will not find that here. Feb 18, Matt rated it really liked it Shelves: Meldrum has a tough job here: At times the book gets mired down in data and science. However, if the author failed to take this course the book simply wouldn't accomplish what it has: I don't think there are many skeptics out there who can, given the quality and veracity of the growing body of evidence.
Nicely done Professor, and my hat i Prof.
- Thérèse Raquin (Penguin Classics).
- Beet Hot Dish Recipes;
- New Jersey (Best Hikes With Children).
Nicely done Professor, and my hat is off to you for your professional courage. It isn't easy to give the establishment a slap in the face, while living and working in it. Meldrum certainly makes the case that there is indeed a large ape running around in our Pacific Northwest woods. No body or bones have been turned up, but Meldrum points out that the footprints that have been found provide compelling evidence that needs to be taken more seriously by the scientific community.
He also defends the film of "Bigfoot" taken in the 60s as genuine, and not a hoax as some have maintained. Jeff Meldrum is associate professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State Unive Meldrum certainly makes the case that there is indeed a large ape running around in our Pacific Northwest woods.